Gemba a weblog about better ways to makes things better

OEE Basics from Europe

by Charles Lukey

What is OEE and what can it do?

OEE stands for Overall Equipment Effectiveness. Done correctly, it can show you where your machines are losing money and what you can do about it.

OEE is a powerful metric, calculated from three simple numbers:

Equipment AVAILABILITY
Equipment PERFORMANCE
QUALITY of Product Produced On the Equipment

Those measures, defined as percentages, are multiplied together to create the machine’s OEE. Getting started is a challenge, but once you know a machine’s OEE, you’ve got a management tool that can be used by everyone involved machine operators right on up to the CEO.

Recently, I spent a week in Holland learning about OEE and a new software product designed to simplify OEE calculation and reporting.

OEE Toolkit is a software package designed by FullFact Bv of Aarle-Rixtel, Holland. Gemba Research has partnered with FullFact to bring OEE Toolkit to the US.

Arno Bouten, a lead consultant for FullFact, was my teacher.

I will assume you can know nothing about OEE so we start with the basics, he said, but of course you probably understand more than you know. With this Zen-like introduction, we began. Arno uses a series of one-page word problems (Here we call them Challenges) to teach the novice.

Since we’re in Holland, let’s use the example of a beer bottling plant.

This plant, Venlo Brewing, uses a bottle & packaging line known as a BP-4. The bottling line can run 40,000 bottles an hour. Though they try to stay inside a one day shift, VB frequently runs into overtime.

So let’s calculate an OEE for one day on the BP-4.

First, determine Equipment AVAILABILITY. The day shift starts at 6:00 am and ends at 5:00 pm. One 15 minute break in the morning, a half hour lunch, another 15 minute break in the afternoon. That’s 11 hours of machine availability. Hey, the machine doesn’t need breaks, right? So that’s 660 minutes.

The crew worked 10 hours, or 600 minutes. So, 600 minutes actual divided by 660 minutes available makes 90.9 percent. There’s our first number.

Equipment AVAILABILITY: 90.9%

Now, let’s measure Equipment PERFORMANCE. The BP-4 is rated at 40,000 bottles an hour. That’s known as the Name Plate Capacity. One of the main reasons Venlo bought a BP-4 was that capacity. On this day, however, the machine produced 24,800 bottles an hour. So, smaller divided by the larger, 24,800 divided by 40,000, is 62%.

Equipment AVAILABILITY: 90.9%
Equipment PERFORMANCE: 62.0%

Finally, let’s measure QUALITY of Product Produced on the Equipment. The BP-4 produced 248,000 bottles of beer today. Of that total, 24,800 bottles were rejected. Now, 24,800 divided by 248,000 is 10% which gives us:

Equipment AVAILABILITY: 90.9%
Equipment PERFORMANCE: 62.0%
QUALITY of product produced on the equipment: 90%

Multiply them together (.909 x .620 x .900) and you get an OEE of 50.7%.

I looked up at Arno. Is that good?

He replied, Well 85% is considered world class.

So Venlo has a way to go.

It would seem so, yes.

So now that we know, what can we do with an OEE number beside post it on the wall?

Well, Arno replied, we can start by doing a little root cause analysis - start asking why.

Why do we lose an hour’s production to breaks every day? Can we split the breaks up and keep running?

Why can’t the BP-4 run at 100% of Name Plate Capacity?
What issues do we need to address to get to 100%?
Why don’t we establish an acceptable reject rate?
Is 10% high or low?
Can we really shoot for zero?

All these questions and we’d only done one Challenge. And really, it was a pretty simple problem. I needed a break. Arno and I walked into the village for a cup of coffee. As we walked, he explained how OEE Toolkit created actionable data. This afternoon you’ll see how the software really makes it easy in the early going it’s all about commitment.

Commitment - and making sure you do the math.

By Jon Miller - February 22, 2005 7:12 PM

Comments

please give the details about oee, ope,&kaizen

Posted by: k.Hariprasad - May 24, 2007 5:14 AM

is oee the same as yield ie if i increase the oee by10% will the yield increase by 10% also

Posted by: pat hutchinson - July 13, 2008 1:33 PM

Hi Pat,

If by yield you mean quality yield then the answer is no. OEE is calculated as

Availability x Performance x Quality

such that Quality includes yield, defects, scrap losses etc.

So increasing the OEE by 10% can be a result in increasing any or all of A, P and Q. You can increase OEE but still not increase yield.

If by yield you simply mean output over a period of time, the answer is approximately yes.

Posted by: Jon Miller - July 13, 2008 11:00 PM

Post a Comment

Comments are moderated to filter spam and inappropriate content. There may be a delay before your comment is published.




Recent Artices
Virtual Facory Tours on YouTube

Keep your chin up, global manufacturing! Even though new factory orders dipped recently to record more>>

By Jon Miller - January 4, 2009 4:53 PM0 comments>>
Ask Gemba

We want to make it easier to start conversations and find answers here at more>>

By Jon Miller - January 3, 2009 1:57 PM0 comments>>
5 Ways to Boost Kaizen Consciousness in 2009

Improved quality, reduced cost, better teamwork, faster response to customer needs - there are as more>>

By Jon Miller - January 1, 2009 11:19 PM1 comments>>
HP Printer Pokayoke Example

This is a new HP C7250 printer we purchased a few weeks ago. It's quite more>>

By Jon Miller - December 30, 2008 12:53 AM0 comments>>
Yaruki: The Will to Win Even in Tough Times

RC Bhargava, the Chairman, Maruti Suzuki India recounts the story of Maruti Suzuki and how more>>

By Jon Miller - December 28, 2008 7:53 PM3 comments>>
9 Surprises for U.S. Manufacturing in 2009

1. Will you shut up about kaizen, Tom? Newly appointed U.S. Secretary of Agriculture more>>

By Jon Miller - December 24, 2008 4:05 PM4 comments>>
Let's Do Kaizen, Not Kaizan

It doesn't really matter how you pronounce the Japanese word for continuous improvement through more>>

By Jon Miller - December 23, 2008 12:20 PM0 comments>>
Answers to Lean Thinking Crossword Puzzle #1

Spoiler alert! The answers to Lean Thinking Crossword Puzzle #1 are below. Here are the more>>

By Jon Miller - December 20, 2008 2:20 AM0 comments>>
Lean Thinking Crossword Puzzle #1

Here is a quiz we used as a review of lean knowledge for the team more>>

By Jon Miller - December 19, 2008 3:24 AM0 comments>>
Field Report from Gemba Tour #62, Part 4

Today was day-long visit to a company who is 13 years on their lean more>>

By Jon Miller - December 18, 2008 8:16 AM1 comments>>
Field Report from Gemba Tour #62, Part 3

Today wast the Toyota plant tour day of our Japan Kaikaku Experience #62. I noticed more>>

By Jon Miller - December 17, 2008 5:21 AM0 comments>>
Field Report from Gemba Tour #62, Part 2

I have seen the future of logistics, and it is green. Today we visited more>>

By Jon Miller - December 16, 2008 7:08 AM3 comments>>
Field Report from Gemba Tour #62, Part 1

The last few weeks haven't been very productive ones for writing blog articles due more>>

By Jon Miller - December 15, 2008 5:34 AM2 comments>>
If Blame Helped Solve Problems...

...the interview with Newt Gingrich on Fox News would be a brilliant way to get more>>

By Jon Miller - December 5, 2008 11:07 PM8 comments>>
$34,000,000,000

Sigh. Chrysler wants $7 billion. They asked Congress for this taxpayer money in a 14-page more>>

By Jon Miller - December 2, 2008 8:11 PM5 comments>>
PDCA is About Not Telling Lies

This circle doesn't lie. In fact one could say that used properly, it is more>>

By Jon Miller - December 1, 2008 5:39 AM6 comments>>
With Competitors Like These, Who Needs a Winning Business Strategy?

Larry, Curly and Moe go to Washington image credit: Wall Street Journal As we more>>

By Jon Miller - November 27, 2008 10:00 PM4 comments>>
It's a Lousy Time to Implement Lean

Author, teacher and our friend Bob Emiliani from the Center for Lean Business Management pointed more>>

By Jon Miller - November 25, 2008 8:08 PM4 comments>>
The Big 3 Must Follow in Toyota's Footsteps to Survive

The Big 3 automotive companies must follow in Toyota's footsteps to survive. There are three more>>

By Jon Miller - November 23, 2008 7:34 PM6 comments>>
Ambiguous Visual Controls: This Way is Up

This makes it three for three on scoring photos of ambiguous visual controls during visits more>>

By Jon Miller - November 12, 2008 2:51 PM3 comments>>
Blogroll
Improve With me
Lean Companies
Agile Management Blog
Curious Cat
DailyKaizen
Evolving Excellence
Fashion-Incubator
Got Boondoggle?
Lean Blog
Lean Insider
Lean Builder
Lean Reflections
Lean Six Sigma Academy
Learn Sigma
Productivity Cafe
Reforming Project Management
Shmula
The Lean Thinker
Thinking for a Change
TPM Log