His Name is on Every CarBy Jon Miller | Post Date: February 24, 2010 10:48 AM | Comments: 5
(AP Photo/Shizuo Kambayashi)
Akio Toyoda Congressional Testimony
February 23, 2010
I am Akio Toyoda of Toyota Motor Corporation. I would first like to state that I love cars as much as anyone, and I love Toyota as much as anyone. I take the utmost pleasure in offering vehicles that our customers love, and I know that Toyota's 200,000 team members, dealers, and suppliers across America feel the same way. However, in the past few months, our customers have started to feel uncertain about the safety of Toyota's vehicles, and I take full responsibility for that. Today, I would like to explain to the American people, as well as our customers in the U.S. and around the world, how seriously Toyota takes the quality and safety of its vehicles. I would like to express my appreciation to Chairman Towns and Ranking Member Issa, as well as the members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, for giving me this opportunity to express my thoughts today. I would like to focus my comments on three topics - Toyota's basic philosophy regarding quality control, the cause of the recalls, and how we will manage quality control going forward. First, I want to discuss the philosophy of Toyota's quality control. I myself, as well as Toyota, am not perfect. At times, we do find defects. But in such situations, we always stop, strive to understand the problem, and make changes to improve further. In the name of the company, its long-standing tradition and pride, we never run away from our problems or pretend we don't notice them. By making continuous improvements, we aim to continue offering even better products for society. That is the core value we have kept closest to our hearts since the founding days of the company. At Toyota, we believe the key to making quality products is to develop quality people. Each employee thinks about what he or she should do, continuously making improvements, and by doing so, makes even better cars. We have been actively engaged in developing people who share and can execute on this core value. It has been over 50 years since we began selling in this great country, and over 25 years since we started production here. And in the process, we have been able to share this core value with the 200,000 people at Toyota operations, dealers, and suppliers in this country. That is what I am most proud of. Second, I would like to discuss what caused the recall issues we are facing now. Toyota has, for the past few years, been expanding its business rapidly. Quite frankly, I fear the pace at which we have grown may have been too quick. I would like to point out here that Toyota's priority has traditionally been the following: First; Safety, Second; Quality, and Third; Volume. These priorities became confused, and we were not able to stop, think, and make improvements as much as we were able to before, and our basic stance to listen to customers' voices to make better products has weakened somewhat. We pursued growth over the speed at which we were able to develop our people and our organization, and we should sincerely be mindful of that. I regret that this has resulted in the safety issues described in the recalls we face today, and I am deeply sorry for any accidents that Toyota drivers have experienced. Especially, I would like to extend my condolences to the members of the Saylor family, for the accident in San Diego. I would like to send my prayers again, and I will do everything in my power to ensure that such a tragedy never happens again. Since last June, when I first took office, I have personally placed the highest priority on improving quality over quantity, and I have shared that direction with our stakeholders. As you well know, I am the grandson of the founder, and all the Toyota vehicles bear my name. For me, when the cars are damaged, it is as though I am as well. I, more than anyone, wish for Toyota's cars to be safe, and for our customers to feel safe when they use our vehicles. Under my leadership, I would like to reaffirm our values of placing safety and quality the highest on our list of priorities, which we have held to firmly from the time we were founded. I will also strive to devise a system in which we can surely execute what we value. Third, I would like to discuss how we plan to manage quality control as we go forward. Up to now, any decisions on conducting recalls have been made by the Customer Quality Engineering Division at Toyota Motor Corporation in Japan. This division confirms whether there are technical problems and makes a decision on the necessity of a recall. However, reflecting on the issues today, what we lacked was the customers' perspective. To make improvements on this, we will make the following changes to the recall decision making process. When recall decisions are made, a step will be added in the process to ensure that management will make a responsible decision from the perspective of "customer safety first." To do that, we will devise a system in which customers' voices around the world will reach our management in a timely manner, and also a system in which each region will be able to make decisions as necessary. Further, we will form a quality advisory group composed of respected outside experts from North America and around the world to ensure that we do not make a misguided decision. Finally, we will invest heavily in quality in the U.S., through the establishment of an Automotive Center of Quality Excellence, the introduction of a new position - Product Safety Executive, and the sharing of more information and responsibility within the company for product quality decisions, including defects and recalls. Even more importantly, I will ensure that members of the management team actually drive the cars, and that they check for themselves where the problem lies as well as its severity. I myself am a trained test driver. As a professional, I am able to check on problems in a car, and can understand how severe the safety concern is in a car. I drove the vehicles in the accelerator pedal recall as well as the Prius, comparing the vehicles before and after the remedy in various environmental settings. I believe that only by examining the problems on-site, can one make decisions from the customer perspective. One cannot rely on reports or data in a meeting room. Through the measures I have just discussed, and with whatever results we obtain from the investigations we are conducting in cooperation with NHTSA, I intend to further improve on the quality of Toyota vehicles and fulfill our principle of putting the customer first. My name is on every car. You have my personal commitment that Toyota will work vigorously and unceasingly to restore the trust of our customers. Thank you. Hi Javier Some Toyota veterans say this is the perfect crisis for the new CEO to prove himself and quickly set the tone for how he will lead the company. It certainly is a big enough problem, involves external pressure and demands some changes from the highest levels of the organization. So in that sense it's a much better burning platform than "we need to be #1 in volume" which has been their driver. Former Toyota executive Jim Press was quoted saying today that the root cause of Toyota's problems was that "the company was hijacked, some years ago, by anti-family, financially oriented pirates”. This may or may not be true but it feels more like blame assignment than root cause analysis. What's the process to check that anti-family, financially oriented elements do not hijack Toyota? Was there a process or a check on that process? Was there a lack of risk management in terms of the dilution of their values or principles? There has been a lot of talk of "quality people" being the source of Toyota's quality but how is that measured? First Toyota needs to ask these questions and not go with "the last bunch was at fault, the new bunch will save us" approach that Jim Press seems to be indicating. We shouldn't take Mr. Press' quote out of context as most likely he just meant to express strong support for Mr. Toyoda, but the phrase "root cause" should not be used lightly by a Toyota person within earshot of other lean thinkers. Poster: Jon Miller | Post Date: February 24, 2010 8:34 PM This doesn't appear to be a plant quality or quality system failure within the assembly organization yet one of the top initiatives announced by Toyota was an increased inspection process so there is not much help there to the current problems and looks more like window dressing for the public. This really appears to be a two part failure. First there is a design/engineering/testing failure and possibly that could be tied to rapid growth. However, it caould also be tied to a deliberate shortening of standards that led to these various failures impacting the public. The 2nd part is more disturbing on all fronts and that is the appearance that Toyota has engaged in systematic dismissal and cover up of customer complaints for a very long time even while knowing that these had sometimes fatal consequences for the consumer. It is hard to believe that this was not a conscious act within Toyota and its dealer network in order to maintain their public quality reputation. I think their plant performance is liekly as good as ever and their lean systems work within the four walls but there are serious doubts as to the intent of their manipulations and actions in the market place and safety arena and the apologies are wearing thin without the cause being revealed. It seems new issues are being exposed almost daily and that indicates a significant if not total breakdown or shift to their`long term philosophy and principals. The issue of rapid growth in Toyota has been the subject of numerous articles and blogs for many years now and fot Toyota leadership to be deaf to that criticism and reality strains credibility and credibility is what this is all about. Trust, once lost is difficult to regain, especially in the auto industry. It is unlikely that anyone who experienced these various phenomena or their immediate friends and family will trust Toyota again and in this industry, that can be generational. Finally, there is a cultural gap that has been exposed and it includes Toyota misunderstanding how Americans view safety issues as well as the expectations in crisis. Toyota scores poorly on this and again, the constantly repeated apologies, while part of the Japanese culture, are likely having an unintended effect of admitting guilt in ours. Poster: Norm | Post Date: February 25, 2010 5:36 AM While there are many issues to consider within the so called “crisis” facing Toyota Motor Company… in all of my research into this conundrum, I will ask this single question; Why is the largest share holder of General Motors, the United States Government, conducting hearings into this “crisis.” I believe the very definition of ‘Conflict of Interest’ is being played out before our very eyes. Just a thought. Poster: Terry Earl Richards | Post Date: February 28, 2010 6:31 PM Funny, Terry Earl Richards question brings flashbacks of a scene from the movie Lord of the Rings - Two Towers Grima Forktongue's line - " A just question my liege." Poster: John Santomer | Post Date: March 6, 2010 11:01 PM |




Points to ponder: Can we consider Mr Akio Toyoda as the "right man for the right crisis" after all, the current situation goes to the core of what Toyota is and stands for, considering the Toyota Way. Would any other CEO have done the same, would he have taken the same approach? I don't know. Perhaps is time for some soul searching in some areas of the Toyota corporation. Any thoughts on this Jon?